Skip to content
The Concord Review

The Concord Review Submissions

SelectiveremoteFreeJournal✓ How we vet

The Concord Review is the only quarterly journal in the world to publish the academic research papers of secondary students. Students are encouraged to submit their history papers for consideration.

§ Program information

Sourced from the official program page. Where a field says Not confirmed, we couldn't verify it — check the official site before applying.

Location
Not confirmed — check the official program page.
Duration
Not confirmed — check the official program page.
Deadline
Not confirmed — check the official program page.
Grades
9, 10, 11, 12
Format
remote
Cost
Free
Interests
Track your application
View tracker →Report an outcome →
Share
Checking link status…
Suggest an edit
§ General application guidance from Atlas

How to think about programs like this.

This guidance is general and may not reflect this program's exact selection process. Always confirm details on the official program page before applying.

What this program actually is

The Concord Review Submissions is a journal run by The Concord Review. It's built for 9th–12th grade students who want to submit work to The Concord Review in your field of interest.

There's no cost to participate. That covers the program itself — check the official page separately for whether travel, housing, or meals are included.

Who it's for

Programs like this get the strongest applications from students who can point to a specific reason they want this one — not just "any research program" or "any internship."

  • Students in 9th–12th grade — check the official page for exact grade cutoffs before applying.
  • Open to students nationwide (and often internationally — verify on the official site).

Typical day-to-day in programs like this

The following describes what participants generally do in journals of this shape — not a confirmed schedule for The Concord Review Submissions. Always check the official program page for the actual activities.

  • Prepare a submission that meets the journal's format, length, and citation requirements — the submission itself replaces an interview or attendance component.
  • Expect a review process: acceptance, rejection, or revise-and-resubmit, sometimes with editor feedback.
  • If accepted, you get a byline and a citable publication — a concrete outcome for future applications.

How to apply well

Selection is competitive but not unrealistic. A thoughtful application usually beats a decorated one.

  • Start with the deadline: check the official page for the exact date. Work backwards — most students underestimate how long recommendations and essay drafts take.
  • Read the official page twice before writing anything. Note the exact prompts and word counts.
  • Answer the actual question. Reviewers read hundreds of essays; specificity beats polish.
  • Submit at least 24 hours before the deadline. Portals crash. Files fail to upload. Give yourself the buffer.

Cost, funding & logistics

Cost and logistics kill more applications than eligibility does. Sort these out before you get emotionally invested.

  • Format: Fully remote — no travel needed.
  • There's no cost to participate. That covers the program itself — check the official page separately for whether travel, housing, or meals are included.

After the program

The most valuable thing you take from The Concord Review Submissions is usually the concrete outcome itself, not a network — this kind of journal doesn't come with guaranteed mentors or peers. Treat it as one data point in a bigger application story.

Add the program to your resume, but also write down (for yourself) what specifically you learned, what you'd do differently, and what question you now want to answer next. That reflection is what turns a summer into a direction.

Atlas guidance is written from public information about programs in this category. It is not a promise about The Concord Review Submissions's actual selection process.

More like this.

Explore the Finder →