Skip to content
The Concord Review, Inc.

National Writing Board

Highly SelectiveremotePaidCompetition✓ How we vet

The National Writing Board assesses academic expository writing against an independent standard endorsed by Harvard, Michigan, Princeton, Stanford, Virginia, Yale, and 33 other selective colleges and universities.

§ Program information

Sourced from the official program page. Where a field says Not confirmed, we couldn't verify it — check the official site before applying.

Location
Not confirmed — check the official program page.
Duration
Not confirmed — check the official program page.
Deadline
rolling
Grades
9, 10, 11, 12
Format
remote
Cost
Program cost — see official site
Track your application
View tracker →Report an outcome →
Share
Checking link status…
Suggest an edit
§ General application guidance from Atlas

How to think about programs like this.

This guidance is general and may not reflect this program's exact selection process. Always confirm details on the official program page before applying.

What this program actually is

National Writing Board is a competition run by The Concord Review, Inc.. It's built for 9th–12th grade students who want to enter a competition hosted by The Concord Review, Inc. in Creative Writing.

There is a program cost. Check the official site for need-based aid; many similar programs offer partial or full scholarships and don't advertise them prominently.

Who it's for

Programs like this get the strongest applications from students who can point to a specific reason they want this one — not just "any research program" or "any internship."

  • Students in 9th–12th grade — check the official page for exact grade cutoffs before applying.
  • Open to students nationwide (and often internationally — verify on the official site).
  • Strongest fit for students already curious about: Creative Writing. You don't need prior formal experience — curiosity beats credentials.

Typical day-to-day in programs like this

The following describes what participants generally do in competitions of this shape — not a confirmed schedule for National Writing Board. Always check the official program page for the actual activities.

  • Build or write a submission on your own timeline — the competition is the application.
  • Get feedback from judges and, at some stages, from peers and mentors.
  • If you place, you'll have a concrete, external validation you can put on any future application.

How to apply well

Selection is competitive but not unrealistic. A thoughtful application usually beats a decorated one.

  • This program lists rolling admissions rather than a single deadline — but "rolling" usually means spots or funding fill over time, so applying earlier is still an advantage. Don't wait for a deadline that may never come.
  • Read the official page twice before writing anything. Note the exact prompts and word counts.
  • Answer the actual question. Reviewers read hundreds of essays; specificity beats polish.

Cost, funding & logistics

Cost and logistics kill more applications than eligibility does. Sort these out before you get emotionally invested.

  • Format: Fully remote — no travel needed.
  • There is a program cost. Check the official site for need-based aid; many similar programs offer partial or full scholarships and don't advertise them prominently.

After the program

The most valuable thing you take from National Writing Board is usually the concrete outcome itself, not a network — this kind of competition doesn't come with guaranteed mentors or peers. Treat it as one data point in a bigger application story.

Add the program to your resume, but also write down (for yourself) what specifically you learned, what you'd do differently, and what question you now want to answer next. That reflection is what turns a summer into a direction.

Atlas guidance is written from public information about programs in this category. It is not a promise about National Writing Board's actual selection process.

More like this.

Explore the Finder →